Why Rivets, Not Icebergs, Sink Websites
September 10th, 2008. Posted by Kyle Aspinall
96 years after the Titanic sank, it was revealed that the people who built the famous ship had used cheap iron rivets where — as fate would have it — the infamous iceberg hit.
The true tragedy is that it appears the calamity of the Titanic could have been avoided and hundreds of lives saved …
Before we condemn the Titanic’s builders and financiers for their fatal cost-cutting decision, we should ask ourselves: Has the conventional wisdom really changed in the past 96 years?
Every day, small business owners to corporate CEO’s are forced to make decisions allowing dangerous leaks in the websites they manage.
Harlan and Wolff, the builders of the Titanic, continue to deny that their choice of rivets was to blame. However - while their competitors relied exclusively on steel rivets for a ship’s bow, stern and hull - Harlan and Wolff used low-grade iron rivets.
A new book on the Titanic, co-authored by Jennifer Hooper McCarty, exposes the panic at Harlan and Wolff before the Titanic was launched. McCarty, who studied the archives, said “The board was in crisis mode … It was constant stress. Every meeting it was: There’s problems with the rivets and we need to hire more people.”
Considering Harlan and Wolff were building three of the largest ships in the world – Britannic, Olympic and Titanic – all at the same time, it must have seemed a good idea to keep costs down. However, faced with a relatively common iceberg, their penny pinching proved disastrous.
This same approach is causing websites everywhere, every day, to sink. Maybe they didn’t have enough time or budget to make sure it was built right. Maybe they compromised. Maybe they went with the cheapest website builder or just chose the company that could finish the fastest. Maybe they decided not to hire a good copywriter. With the allure of selling the board the idea of one provider, maybe they gave the task of planning, building and writing the site to their ad agency.
So the launch goes ahead anyway, and when the site doesn’t sink it’s considered a success because, like the Titanic, it has every conceivable luxury – cafes, squash courts, a swimming pool, Turkish baths, a barbershop, three libraries - and cheap rivets.
With that mentality, is it any wonder why - year after year - the average online conversion rate rarely reaches 2%?
It doesn’t have to be this way.
If your web strategy is more focused on bells and whistles than nuts and bolts (or rivets), maybe it’s time to stop playing shuffle board and get an online supplier focused on conversion to check ‘below deck’ at what’s holding your site together, before those leaks prove fatal to your business online.
September 18th, 2008 at 12:20 am
Anna,
Your end comments are extremely accurate. The majority of people will select a website build company based on their ability to either meet an unrealistic deadline, or meet their unrealistic budget. Both are extremely poor reasons. An extremely high incidence of failure occurs with these websites for all the reasons you mentioned above plus the inability to pre plan or strategically plan their online approach.
Greg
September 25th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
I talked with one of my friends the other day about online conversion. He thought Google is not a good place to advertise as the conversion rate of his websites are low.(Not even reached the global average of 2%)
The problem here is not the ads themselves but the other factors like the landing pages, the website design in terms of users experience or even the online marketing strategies.
September 30th, 2008 at 10:13 am
All too often the perceived success of a website is based on how it looks. As with offline advertising, companies tend to focus on the creative/design rather than the offering. If your website is not relevant and fulfilling your customers needs you will not be successful online.